Philosophia Polymathematica

In philosophical terms, in order for one to have knowledge, one must hold beliefs that are both justified and true. Consequently untrue beliefs necessarily fail to meet the standard to qualify as knowledge. Since divining the truth regarding a given matter can often require balancing one’s curiosity and doubt with openness and acceptance, it would appear that skeptics are uniquely well-positioned to acquire knowledge. Skeptics are inquisitive individuals who question the validity and veracity of claims, ideas, and beliefs. Resistant to the practice of accepting claims at face value, they tend to reserve judgment until presented with at least some form of compelling evidence, proof, testimony, or other suitable basis that speaks to the authenticity of the claim in question. They eventually come to accept the authenticity of claims once their inquisitiveness is sufficiently satisfied. [Note: For purposes of this post, the noun cynic should be construed, in line with one of its vernacula...

As human beings we inescapably use information to form beliefs (i.e., conclusions) on all manner of things. As such, information necessarily constitutes the premises to our beliefs, structuring their very path. Erroneous, irrelevant, or incomplete information would, therefore, misguide any beliefs. Given the sheer volume of information that modern life hurls at us, critically evaluating information in service of the formation of conclusions regarding important matters becomes indispensable. Critically evaluating guidance of any sort is undoubtedly an entire science in and of itself. No singular blog post could ever serve as a sufficient exposition. This post is merely an insufficient exposition on this matter. It should also be mentioned that the best practices discussed ahead are suitable for issues one can, for the most part, think about coldly and objectively (  e.g.,  when considering the recommendation of an alternative route to one’s destination from a taxi driver). On t...